By Writing Excuses | October 21, 2012 - 9:33 pm - Posted in Business, Fantasy, Guest, Season 7

James L Sutter  joins us before a live audience at GenCon Indy for a discussion of tie-in fiction. James is a writer and editor, and is one of the co-creators of the Pathfinder system. He is the author of Pathfinder Tales: Death’s Heretic and is the editor in charge of all of Paizo’s Pathfinder fiction.

James leads by telling us that if you want to write for Pathfinder, the first thing you need to do is write something for somebody else. As the editor of that division at Paizo, he’s the gatekeeper, and that’s the first hurdle you need to clear. He also talks to us about what he’s looking for in an author.

We talk at length about the Pathfinder line, its genesis, and James’s mission with Paizo regarding the tie-in fiction. He tells us about the things that turn him off in a submitted manuscript, and what sorts of work he does with his writers to help make the tie-in fiction actually, you know, tie in.

Audiobook Pick-of-the-Week: Railsea, by China Mieville, narrated by Jonathan Crowley

Writing Prompt: Write a story in which all the characters are simultaneously the good guy AND the bad guy.

This episode of Writing Excuses has been brought to you by Audible.

Visit http://AudiblePodcast.com/excuse for a free trial membership.

Audible Free Trial Details

Get an audiobook of your choice, free, with a 30-day trial. After the trial, your paid membership will begin at $14.95 per month. With your membership, you will receive one credit every month, good for any audiobook on Audible.

Cancel anytime, effective the next monthly billing cycle. Cancel before your trial ends and you will not be charged. Check out the full terms and policies that apply to Audible membership.

This entry was posted on Sunday, October 21st, 2012 at 9:33 pm and is filed under Business, Fantasy, Guest, Season 7. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

9 Comments

  1. October 21, 2012 @ 10:00 pm


    Based on the point James made about basic cleanup, an interesting free tool I’ve used and like is smart edit. It will point out commonly screwed up words (effect/affect, than/then, etc), cliches, and those sorts of things to help you clean up those bits of silliness. It isn’t the be all end all, but can help spot foolish mistakes.

    Posted by Patrick Sullivan
  2. October 22, 2012 @ 8:26 pm


    Excellent podcast. More interviews please.

    Posted by Tony
  3. October 22, 2012 @ 11:37 pm


    Nitpicky… but the file title is ‘editing’ not ‘tie in fantasy fiction etc’

    Posted by Andrew Girle
  4. October 23, 2012 @ 6:41 am


    Anyone who recommends China Mieville, is okay by me – at last, a new kind of fantasy, that isn’t just Tolkein by another name.

    Really interesting podcast. I am one of those that doesn’t read tie-in fiction, as I think it’s usually just churned out to make money – all plot and no craft. But I may try a Pathfinder novel.

    Posted by Chella
  5. October 23, 2012 @ 12:58 pm


    This is a bit off topic, but thinking about tie-ins and world building got me thinking of maid and butler dialogue and info dumping.

    Is it still maid and butler dialogue if one character is asking another character about something that they don’t know about (like a supernatural item or world etc), and the other answers each of the questions in paragraphs explaining it?… or maybe its info dumping? Is it acceptable? Would it be better if the characters were doing something during the Q&A?

    Again, I know its off topic a little, but some insight would be greatly appreciated.

    Thanks!

    Posted by Sean
  6. October 24, 2012 @ 2:29 am


    Smartedit sounds cool. I’ll check it out.

    Posted by Daniel Bensen
  7. October 24, 2012 @ 8:25 am


    @Sean, a character that legitimately doesn’t know something and asks and then the explanation is given is acceptable if done right. You correctly pointed out potential pitfalls of the method, overlong info dumps, etc. It should be handled with care.

    Having the characters doing something while explaining can help. Try to give the information in a way that shows instead of tells and try to accomplish multiple things with the same scene and dialog.

    Maybe the explanation of how the shareholder’s meeting played out also shows how Maggie feels responsible for Uncle Eddie’s alcoholism and kick starts Joey’s love for Maggie & his efforts to save her family widget factory.

    You could also provide pieces of the explanation in several places so when combined, give the reader the whole picture you want them to have without forcing them to swallow it in one large info dump.

    Posted by Talmage
  8. October 25, 2012 @ 8:40 pm


    Roll the dice and pick your role?

    Or, you could just read the transcript. Right over here:

    http://wetranscripts.livejournal.com/65143.html

    Posted by Mike Barker
  9. October 25, 2012 @ 11:56 pm


    @Talmage

    I’m starting to see how tricky it gets when somebody needs to explain (in detail) how something from another world works. But I think your comment has gotten me thinking in the right direction. Thanks!

    Posted by Sean