It’s time for our fourth “Project in Depth” episode, and now Dan Wells is on the spot. The Hollow City is Dan’s latest book, and while it’s not a new John Cleaver book, it’s still a supernatural thriller with a tight psychological focus.

Spoilers galore, of course. If you haven’t read The Hollow City yet, go read it before listening to this episode.

Dan’s New Twitter Handle: Per Howard’s suggestion, @JohnCleaver has been retired in favor of @TheDanWells.

Audiobook Pick-of-the-Week: Sucks to be Me, by Kimberly Pauley, narrated by Nancy Wu

Writing Prompt: Go find an interesting mental illness (quick, before Dan takes all the good ones.) Now write from the sufferer's POV, but don't tell us what's actually wrong.

This episode of Writing Excuses has been brought to you by Audible.

Visit http://AudiblePodcast.com/excuse for a free trial membership.

Audible Free Trial Details

Get an audiobook of your choice, free, with a 30-day trial. After the trial, your paid membership will begin at $14.95 per month. With your membership, you will receive one credit every month, good for any audiobook on Audible.

Cancel anytime, effective the next monthly billing cycle. Cancel before your trial ends and you will not be charged. Check out the full terms and policies that apply to Audible membership.

This entry was posted on Sunday, July 29th, 2012 at 7:07 pm and is filed under Conflicts, Editing, Outlining, POV, Project in Depth, Season 7, Setting, World Building. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

14 Comments

  1. July 29, 2012 @ 8:28 pm


    I was a psychology major in college, and one of the things that annoys me greatly when I read books is when people get the psychology wrong. I love the fact that with your books you take the time to get it right, I think that really helps the books.

    Before I switched to psychology as my major, I was a music major, so the fact that you originally based the outline of this book around a fugue is even cooler to me (even if it didn’t work out as a fugue).

    Posted by Adam
  2. July 29, 2012 @ 10:14 pm


    AHHHHH!!!!! I should have listened to the spoiler warning.

    :/

    Posted by Joe Vasicek
  3. July 30, 2012 @ 1:07 am


    Is there any word on when the Hollow City will be available on Audible? I am holding out for the audiobook.

    Posted by Michael Eldredge
  4. July 30, 2012 @ 7:12 am


    I believe the fugue Dan is referring to is “Fugue in G minor, BWV 578″

    Posted by CM
  5. July 30, 2012 @ 7:19 am


    Fugue in G minor, BWV 578. :-)
    Great podcast as always!!!

    Posted by kingofmaybe
  6. July 30, 2012 @ 7:40 am


    Ack! Too soon! ~skip~

    Posted by Michael J Winegar
  7. July 30, 2012 @ 8:30 am


    Re: Michael’s name, is it possible, given that this is Dan we’re talking about, that there’s a connection to Harold Shipman, described by Wikipedia as ‘one of the most prolific serial killers in recorded history’?(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harold_Shipman)

    Posted by Rik Davnall
  8. July 30, 2012 @ 10:36 am


    The fugue is usually known as “The Little Fugue in G Minor”. As Chuck Daellenbach has pointed out, the name was given to distinguish it from the “Great Fugue” in G Minor. Dallenbach goes on to say that despite the name, this is a great fugue, too.

    W.R.T. co-opting a music form for a novel, sonata-allegro, rondo and (as you mention in the podcast) theme-and-variations may offer better clotheslines to hang your words on.

    Posted by Jim Crigler
  9. July 30, 2012 @ 1:28 pm


    Another great podcast. These in-depths have been fun. I do think they would be even stronger had the entire read the book before-hand. That being said, this is a talented group of authors who’s works I’ve enjoyed very much!.

    Posted by Cfornia
  10. July 31, 2012 @ 8:23 pm


    I thought I saw… no, I couldn’t have seen… well, maybe. But if I did, then… no, definitely not. Only crazy people see things like that, and I’m not crazy, so I didn’t see… there goes another one… I definitely did not see that one go by. Did you? No, don’t answer that, I don’t want to know.

    A Transcript! YEAH!

    http://wetranscripts.livejournal.com/62006.html

    Posted by Mike Barker
  11. August 3, 2012 @ 9:02 pm


    The name of the movie you were trying to remember…is it ‘Dark City’? (Rufus Sewel, Jennifer Conolly, Kiefer Sutherland?) Amazing movie. Definitely has a world-shattering reveal of the truth!

    Posted by sspector
  12. August 6, 2012 @ 4:37 am


    Happy to see that Dan has taken a more name-specific twitter handle. His character-named one threw me at first (and continued to do so).

    Posted by Clifton Hill
  13. August 14, 2012 @ 11:47 am


    Re. the use of music as an outline for a story…

    I was reminded of Final Fantasy X, which isn’t based on any one musical work, but does seem to have a musical (rather than three-act or five-act) structure.

    Like good music, it works on principles of contrast, rhythm, and repetition with variation. Violence and confusion alternate with friendship and peace throughout, while the themes of fatherhood rivalry, sacrifice, religious authorities versus individual conscience, and collective versus individual good, all kept replaying in different forms. It reminded me a lot of a thematically-driven symphony.

    In short, I want to see Dan try this fugue idea again, and make it work.

    Posted by Chestertonian Rambler
  14. October 19, 2012 @ 6:12 pm


    [...] prologues are not collected all in one episode.  In know they’ve discussed them on Brandon and Dan’s project-in-depth episodes, explaining how they’ve used prologues in their own [...]